Showing posts with label Christianity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christianity. Show all posts

Friday, March 25, 2016

Philosophy of Discipleship

How do God and man cooperate in sanctification? Do they? If they do, what habits would best facilitate this process of maturation? These are some of the main questions involved at the center of the question of discipleship.
            Discipleship is the primary force within spiritual formation that occurs in community. It is augmented through different practices and habits, which constitute the rest of spiritual formation, and ultimately involves the Divine nature molding the human nature. In my journey to understand discipleship, or even to attempt at developing a personal philosophy on the matter I have come through three various stages.
            The first stage of my understanding of discipleship was excitement. Directly after converting from atheism to Christianity I was enamored with the faith and sought out any who would be willing to discuss the topics I was encountering. In this time, however, I quickly understood that the other men my age were not interested in the things I was learning. So, as it were, I was forced into books. Charles Spurgeon became to me a dear friend, if it is possible to call a man who died over a hundred years before I came to be his brother in the faith such a title. Through his writings I was shaped and molded, many of the actions I had found to be normal were quickly pruned, my passion for the study of Scripture was fostered and a desire for prayer formed.
            The second stage was a much more arrogant stage. I had started moving, due to callousness, toward a sense of theological superiority. The view that others around me didn’t have the same doctrinal understandings as me separated me from other more starkly. What had begun as a genuine lack of comradery was becoming the bastion of my pride. It was in this stage that I began to take a determinists approach to discipleship. To be frank about it, I considered any discipleship that could take place to be enacted by the sovereign God and there was absolutely nothing I could do to stop him or, for that matter, start him. While in this realm of thinking I still daily studied Scripture and continued to keep my prayer journal, but the deep sense of growth began to wane.
            The third stage of my understanding of discipleship is still growing and still happening. The second stage was broken through the severe mercies of God. Now, though, it seems that I am finally coming to a true philosophy of what being a disciple is all about. Discipleship is the primary driving force within spiritual formation that occurs in community.
There are things, habits, within which we can work cooperatively with God to build our faith. I have never had the privilege of being in what I would consider a mentee type of role. But, discipleship does not require a person to be in a mentor/mentee relationship per se.  
Within the Christian community I have seen various forms of discipleship, because there are various forms of learners. Some demanded the mentor/mentee relationship, while others required a softer or more malleable approach to discipleship. This differentiated approach to the understanding of discipleship is an area that seems to be missing in many discipleship models.
            Form the books assigned it seemed to be a reoccurring theme that discipleship reached its height at the time of the Jesus Movement in the 1970’s (this does not consider the ideal approach of Jesus during the fist century). However, if all models of discipleship are static and not dynamic, do we, the Church, truly believe that we are approaching discipleship rightly? As each person is made in the image of God, we must, therefore, approach discipleship with the same type of creativity that we see God utilize in the created order.
Still more, the community aspect of the discipleship process requires the involvement of an individual within the body of Christ. What this means, is that each individual who comes to faith, should be able to find an approach to how they are best discipled. A beginning step to working out the best way to bring up a new believer in Christ and disciple them effectively would be to have the individual take a learning type quiz. These types of quizzes break down the learner into their strongest suite of learning, giving the teacher, the discipler, a base from which to move forward.
If this is true, that each disciple is discipled differently, then the main mark of right discipleship is that I am being taught all that Christ commanded and growing to be more like him. When I was in the first stage of my Christian faith, Charles Spurgeon was discipling me. Yes, he was not alive and so the actions of life-on-life discipleship were not there, but nonetheless, the person with the greatest voice in some of the my most formative Christian days was Charles Spurgeon.
            At this present stage of my life many of the members of my church small group and professors of Southeastern are discipling me. They are teaching me all that Christ commanded. Indeed, they are showing me that I am not strong, but that I am weak and that God is strong. So it remains that discipleship is not that I have sought out, or been sought out to be mentored, but that I have submitted myself to godly men teaching me how to be a godly man according to the commands of Christ.
            But to gain a fuller understanding of this creative discipleship we should look at Matthew 28:18-20, the Great Commission.
“All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.”
This last command of Christ builds an understanding of discipleship that should be descriptive in our differentiated model of discipleship.
First, we must recognize where the authority for our mission resides and is derived. “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me,” it is not partial authority, but all authority. Therefore, it behooves us to begin discipleship on our knees asking the one with all the authority to provide the means to disciple any individual, or be discipled by any individual. The Church is the person of Christ on the earth, as such she is indwelt with divine power to accomplish this mission and should not fear the schemes of evil.
Second, “Go,” we cannot sit and stay or be impartial in the course of disciple making. It is demanded by the very nature of being a Christian to be a disciple maker. To say it another way, it is in our DNA. This means, that in conversation we go forward with the truth; in friendships we go forward with the gospel. We aim to build relationship that can bear the gospel’s weight.
Third, “Make disciples of all nations,” this is the verb of the subject.  The call is not simply to go, it is to make, and we do not make emotionalism or pithy statements, we make disciples. This is the call. This is the life. Additionally, this is not a nationality thing, this is an all nations thing. We go, not to just one ethnicity or socio-economical status, but to all, and of all is who me make disciples.
Forth, “Baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,” this is the portion that I fear is far to often left out. The call to belief is not the end, it is the beginning. We are to baptize them; this symbol is a deeply meaningful statement. It is a statement to the watching world – both physical and spiritual – that the person in the baptismal waters is signing their death certificate, for they are dead to self and alive in Christ and that they are making a war declaration on their sin. What is more is it is a statement in the belief in the Triune God of creation within whom resides all power and authority.
Fifth, “teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.” This is where the journey begins, and where differentiation is key. We teach all that Christ has commanded. As Christ opened up the Old Testament to his disciples so we aim to do the same to those we are discipleing. Thus, the job of discipleship cannot be accomplished void of the Scriptures. Both the Old and the New Testaments are absolutely necessary in the discipleship process. It is not that we are teaching others to emulate our lives, but we are teaching others to be transformed by God for God’s glory.
Sixth, “And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.” This job of discipleship cannot be void of God. He has sent us the Helper. He has sent the Holy Spirit to dwell within each Christian. It is by his power, which belongs to him that we proclaim the gospel to those whom he has purchased from death, to teach them what he has taught us, as he is with us through it all to the end of it all.

Discipleship is the primary force within spiritual formation that occurs in community. It is important that discipleship happens within the community of the Church and not in a void. And it is necessary that discipleship take a differentiated approach to learning. Building on the creativity that God has designed within his creation, and recognizing that we are image bearers of God. In so doing we must stay saturated by Scripture for without this we are not making disciples of Christ, but disciples of self. And we stay constant in prayer as we need Jesus’ authority in order to see him transform lives, teach his commands and see God glorified.

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Treatment of Religions (Pt. 2)

(Part 1 may be read by clicking here.)

Scripture makes clear the way God has set forth for his people to see those of other religions brought to faith in Jesus Christ.

’Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.’ For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. For ‘whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.’ How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher? And how shall they preach unless they are sent? As it is written: ‘How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the gospel of peace, who bring glad tidings of good things!’” (Romans 10:11-15 ESV)

And,

“All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.” (Matthew 28:18-20)

Christians are the spear’s end of evangelism. It is the part, portion and privilege of the believer to bring the good news of King Jesus to the darkened doorsteps of the lost. In so doing, through the power of the Holy Spirit, seeing converts from every tribe, tongue and religion this world has thought to be worthy distractions from the worship of the Father.


With this in mind it is evident the prospects of a person of another religious conviction becoming a faithful servant of Jesus are completely dependent on God’s moving and his people’s going. Thus it is the privilege of the Christian to be part of the mission of God in the redemption of his people across the globe and within varying religions both hostile and peaceful. Truly it will be said (and is said), “The people who walked in darkness have seen a great light; those who dwelt in a land of deep darkness, on them has light shone.” (Isaiah 9:2) So it stands that the prospects of belief in the gospel for those of various religions is that of God himself who is the director of the steps and plans of man (Proverbs 16:9 NKJV). It is he who ultimately saves (Romans 9:16) any soul creating for himself faithful servants who will share in the work of his mission for all believers and his ultimate worship at the consummation of all things.

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Treatment of Religions (Pt. 1)

The list of world religions, both major and minor, is an extensive list wherein many billions of people’s hopes, ideals and aspirations are found. Truly a study of these religions is sobering and saddening whilst also being encouraging. For in the study of other religions it becomes clear the claims of Christianity must be considered valid and truthful for they are the only claims, which rise out of the dross as pure. But, however, the treatment of some of the major and minor world religions accomplished by Winfried Corduan in Neighboring Faiths A Christian Introduction to World Religions and John Dickson in A Spectators’ Guide to World Religions An Introduction to the Big Five ought to be compared and contrasted in so far as they are related; additionally it shall be noted as to the prospects of any persons from any religion outside of Christianity becoming a faithful servant of Jesus Christ.

Beginning with the latter and moving to the former what are the prospects of a person converting from another religion to Christianity? In this area arguments made by Richard Dawkins about the origin of a person as the determining factor of their beliefs must be examined in order to gain a fuller understanding of the prospects of faith in Christ for non-Christians. “If you had been born in India I daresay you’d be saying the same thing about lord Krishna and lord Shiva; if you had been born in Afghanistan I daresay you’d be saying the same thing about Allah…”[1] It is this idea, which must be confronted when considering the hope of one’s salvation from another religion.

At its heart this argument assumes that all religions are the same, with all their claims and pageantry, their attempts at saving man’s soul. In so doing it creates a straw man fallacy, rather than facing each religious claim on their own merit (or folly) it bundles them all into a neat scarecrow made of straw and proceeds to topple them over. But, however, this is stripping Christianity, Islam, Hinduism and all other religions of their religion-specific claims. For there are many something’s[2] which differentiate Christianity from the rest of religion, many doctrines that separate it from the straw man. “…While many of the religions are superficially alike, most of them are fundamentally different.”[3] To be sure karma and grace are at odds; mercy and enlightenment are at odds; Jesus the Messiah and the missing Messiah are at odds; the triune nature of God and the oneness of Allah are at odds.

Therefore, because these religions are not the same and because their fundamental claims, hopes, and aspirations are different, it becomes clear that to assume the birthplace of an individual is the final factor in their belief is rudimentary ignorance on the part of the arguer. It would be as one comparing Mozart and The Rolling Stones declaring them the same.  What is more is this argument discounts the power of God (True, it is made by an atheist and therefore is made in the sense of discrediting God).


[1] Richard Dawkins. Richard Dawkins cruelly answers audience question.  

[2] I use the word “something’s” intentionally for it is often the word used when describing the uniqueness or the under current of Christianity.

[3]John Dickson. A Spectator’s Guide to World Religions: An Introduction to the Big Five.  P. 209